Cannabis Record Keeping Procedures – Seek Advice..

California recreational marijuana dispensaries are collecting customers’ personal data – including government identification documents as well as what products they buy – although the record keeping is not part of Proposition 64, the state law voters approved in November 2016.

Assortment of the data raises concerns for a few as it remains unclear how the federal government intends to respond to marijuana recordkeeping plan, considering that the herb remains a controlled substance in U.S. statutes.

In comparison, Colorado and Oregon, states which also have legalized recreational use, banned assortment of private information. And officials in Washington, another state with legal weed, said building customer databases will not be practiced there.

In addition to concerns about privacy and id theft, the data collection also has caught the eye of Second Amendment proponents, because marijuana use by firearm owners is prohibited under federal law.

A check of vendors nearest Fresno County (which includes no recreational marijuana outlets) found none in which a customer profile was not continued dispensary computers. That includes an outlet in Woodlake in Tulare County in addition to dispensaries in Stanislaus County, Salinas, Santa Cruz, Sacramento and also the Bay Area.

When asked why customer profiles were created, several dispensary workers incorrectly stated the data was required under Proposition 64. Others cited it as a a consumer convenience. All said a customer who did not consent to the terms would be turned away. None of these queried would agree to provide a surname to your Fresno Bee reporter.

Valley Pure, the first legal recreational marijuana store in the region, has opened in Woodlake in Tulare County.

Valley Pure

In Woodlake, a man who identified himself as the manager of Valley Pure, the very first recreational dispensary in Tulare County, cited state regulations for your data collection. He would not identify himself and said inquiries vftzig the information collection constituted “harrassment.”

Jason Finfrock, the reported owner of Valley Pure, said Thursday which he might have no comment on the issue. At the Green Door in San Francisco, a staff member said, “We are going to only ring you up should you come up on our profile.”

At Canna Cruz in Santa Cruz, a male who gave his first name as Ian said the data was essental to law and added, “if an individual didn’t want to do that, we may suggest they not shop at our dispensary.” Similar responses originated from workers at Flavors, inside the Stanislaus County city of Riverbank, at People’s Remedy in Modesto and Alpine Alternatives in Sacramento.